Peter Attia· MD
requiring them to get a booster just so they can go to class despite no evidence that boosters right now help young people maybe some evidence that there's harm now that could change but that's the evidence to date
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
requiring them to get a booster just so they can go to class despite no evidence that boosters right now help young people maybe some evidence that there's harm now that could change but that's the evidence to date
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
of providing boosters to healthy college kids in an effort to prevent transmission the only logically consistent thing to do would be to make sure college kids get boosters every 10 weeks for the rest of their lives because at least that way we might have some ability to reduce the transmission from college kids who would be unharmed by this virus to potentially anybody in their orbit who could be