We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
people I think inadvertently assume that peptides are all safe or innocuous or that they are potent enough to do certain things that we want but that because they're not hormone therapies per se that they are free of side effects and risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you have it in mind that peptide Therapeutics because they aren't hormone therapies are not without their potential risks you would be wrong