We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
what if your quality of life is dramatically compromised as a result of this treatment and yes statistically you're going to live 9 days longer or 3 weeks longer but at what cost to your health in those final remaining days and by the way you're potentially straddling your loved ones with enormous debt um in your absence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
two they may have an opportunity cost that instead of being somebody who in their last few months of life is going to tahiti or going to visit a friend i'm somebody who's tethered to the infusion suite and i got to keep coming back twice weekly for four weeks i got to keep seeing this doctor i got to spend 15 of my extra life you gave me maybe 40 of that i'm spending in your lobby you're taking it back from me
in fact some of these drugs they may actually have a net downside how might that be one they don't actually improve survival that's one they have no survival benefit two they may have an opportunity cost that instead of being somebody who in their last few months of life is going to tahiti or going to visit a friend i'm somebody who's tethered to the infusion suite and i got to keep coming back twice weekly for four weeks i got to keep seeing this doctor i got to spend 15 of my extra life you gave me maybe 40 of that i'm spending in your lobby you're taking it back from me