The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I've been a big promoter of this is that actually giving in patients information in this way is actually the heart of ethical uh evidence-based medical practice. It's It People you need to give patients numbers in a way that they can understand, which is free from coercion and manipulation of their hopes and anxieties.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And really, the, you know, medicine uh should be, and this is well documented for re- from researchers in this field. I've been a big promoter of this is that actually giving in patients information in this way is actually the heart of ethical uh evidence-based
and the you know medicine uh should be and this is well documented for read from researchers in this field I've been a big promoter of this is that actually giving in patients information in this way is actually the heart of ethical evidence-based Medical Practice it's people you need to give patients numbers in a way that they can understand which is free from coercion and manipulation of their hopes and anxieties