Andrew Huberman· PhD
And sure, a lot of those didn't do anything, but some did. And from those, we've got we've found wonderful chemotherapy drugs, drugs that reduce pain, etc.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And sure, a lot of those didn't do anything, but some did. And from those, we've got we've found wonderful chemotherapy drugs, drugs that reduce pain, etc.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But even during that time period when those folks were younger, the pharmaceutical companies, and I make this argument in my book, the pharmaceutical companies had technology to make all kinds of drugs, but they didn't know where to look. And so what did they do? They sent people to traditional cultures around the world to find substances that say the traditional culture say can help people.