The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so he discovered um an emide and decided to call it Bliss because he had familiarity with cannabis or because he he took an emide as a as a direct experience and because it takes a lot for a scientist to discover a molecule but then for a scientist to discover a molecule and then name it Bliss for a particular reason you have to speculate that they they had some familiarity with with the m was also the guy who who isolated and discovered THC
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.