We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
would you actually run into a problem now where you're making too much hemoglobin and half of it is appropriate and half of it is Sickle and therefore not and you could argue you're creating more problems because you've doubled the hemoglobin but you still have the issue where the cells sickle and create all of the distal esia that the person has
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.