Andrew Huberman· PhD
So the scheduling of drugs is a categorization that describes their abuse liability. And so you have drugs like PCP, heroin, cannabis which are Schedule I, which are defined as having high addiction potential and no utility.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So the scheduling of drugs is a categorization that describes their abuse liability. And so you have drugs like PCP, heroin, cannabis which are Schedule I, which are defined as having high addiction potential and no utility.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.