The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There is evidence that it can be beneficial for Leber's congenital eye disease. I would definitely go on to examine.com, put in I-D-E-B-N-O-N-E. And for things like Leber's optic neuropathies, which is a degenerative condition of the eye, whether or not people should just be taking this stuff anyway is still an open question.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.