The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it is FDA approved for Tremor right now and so I actually do it routinely um for patients with Tremor with Parkinson's or a central Tremor and so um I I love doing it it's uh often just kind of a miracle because there's no incision I don't have to place an electrode into the brain to achieve a similar result
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and it's fabulously effective for these patients it treats patients on one side usually their dominant hand or their worst hand and it um it really speaks to the fact that wow you can deliver non-invasively an ablation to the brain in a hypothesized zone that we think is related to the problem at hand and at least with Tremor it works really well