Andrew Huberman· PhD
I just am remiss to believe this until I see some blinded data because I think outside of that we know how powerful an expectancy bias is so it makes it very very challenging to make any kind of firm statements
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I just am remiss to believe this until I see some blinded data because I think outside of that we know how powerful an expectancy bias is so it makes it very very challenging to make any kind of firm statements
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.