The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the package in there are it states there are patients who have prolonged uh treat uh side effects with this drug it says it's there but the true definition of a statement on post aside there's no statement essentially most clinicians don't believe it exists
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the official position of the American Urologic uh what is it AUA Association is what there well if you look at the package in there are it states there are patients who have prolonged uh treat uh side effects with this drug it says it it's there but the true definition of a statement on postfast ride there's no statement essentially