The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it depends on the person it depends on the dose of stimulants it depends on the type of stimulant it depends on what impact it's having on that person um but we need to open our minds to the possibility that yes maybe some people do benefit from stimulants and maybe at the same time other people are harmed in catastrophic Ways by stimulants
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.