We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Sure, people are more alert. They can stay awake more, they can study more intensely and longer. Okay, there's some short-term benefit of that, over there, even there, there can be problems, right? But we can say, let's just say for sake of argument that in the short term, there's something to be gained by doing that, right? But oh my goodness, there's so much that is, there's so much risk to that, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.