The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it seems to me that a random assignment trial would address this and if you didn't want to do randomization you would at least be able to do a post Haw analysis in the way that I've described it and it's amazing that that's not being done
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what you cannot deny is that there's an increased risk of suicides in this population of men irrespective whether you believe it's true or not