Andrew Huberman· PhD
as I understand there's nothing that can predict whether or not someone will have post finasteride syndrome
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as I understand there's nothing that can predict whether or not someone will have post finasteride syndrome
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I haven't seen a great paper that really took a hundred or uh you know 500 men and really tried to evaluate what it was that would predict it so not I'm I'm not aware of any high quality study that can help predict that
it's a good question you know it's a post Hawk diagnosis I haven't seen a great paper that really took a hundred or you know 500 men and really tried to evaluate what it was that would predict it so not I'm I'm not aware of any highquality study that can help predict that Association