Andrew Huberman· PhD
and for the women who got estrogen only those who had a hysterectomy the Premarin they actually had a decreased breast cancer risk and decreased breast cancer mortality
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and for the women who got estrogen only those who had a hysterectomy the Premarin they actually had a decreased breast cancer risk and decreased breast cancer mortality
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the women who were randomized to estrogen had no increased risk of breast cancer in fact if you want to be a stickler and play the same game my recollection is those women had a hazard ratio of 0.7 nine and the confidence interval ended up at one point zero one to translate that into English the women who were on estrogen only had a 21% risk but the 95% confidence interval crossed unity which meant it was not statistically significant the p-value is point zero seven
conjugated estrogen alone was associated with a significant Advocate a statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality so really diametrically opposite effects of the combination with the medroxy progesterone acetate of the estrogen with the hydroxyprogesterone acetate versus the conjugated estrogen alone