The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the higher and higher the dosage gets the less selective it becomes so almost like certain I don't know uh like uh beta blockers for example as you get higher and higher they become less uh receptor selective and you get more like broadspectctrum
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and often times in their quest for for achieving a similar muscle building outcome the higher and higher the dosage gets the less selective it becomes so almost like certain I don't know beta blockers for example as you get higher and higher they become less receptor selective and you get more like broad spectrum
so when people use sarms they do not gain as much muscle as when they use anabolic steroids and often times in their quest for achieving a similar muscle building outcome the higher and higher the dosage gets the less selective it becomes so almost like certain I don't know uh like uh beta blockers for example as you get higher and higher they become less uh receptor selective and you get more like broad spectrum