Andrew Huberman· PhD
a partial responder is um some lesions got smaller some got bigger
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a partial responder is um some lesions got smaller some got bigger
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a partial response is at least a 50% reduction by diameter because remember in this type Imaging you're looking at 2D versus 3D so if you're looking at a lung lesion and it's this big it you know if it's two centimeters long it has to go to at least 1 centimeter in diameter so it's a 50% reduction at least of every single lesion with no new lesions appearing and no lesions growing so it's very strict criteria