The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so like a high THC cannabis is like 20 to 30% if you go for Ty two which is mixed they're both going to fall around 12% uh maybe a little more but in that range and then same if you got a type three it's high CBD it's going to be 20ish per CBD and very low THC
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the type one type two type three so type one is high THC type two is like somewhat balanced and type three is high CBD and now I think like 90 to 90 something low percent of all cannabis that are out there are type one like they're all high THC because that's what's been bred