The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I think we have to appreciate the complexity of the patient meaning if it's perhaps something minor and they can get by without the NSAID and it's not going to change significantly their level of function then maybe not taking it will improve healing they can't get out of bed they can't go to work but an naperson helps them to do that thing so that they can engage with their family with their friends with work well then heck yes take the NSAID
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Meaning if it's perhaps something minor and they can get by without the NSAID and it's not going to change significantly their level of function then maybe not taking it will improve healing They can't get out of bed they can't go to work but an naperson helps them to do that thing so that they can engage with their family with their friends with work Well then heck yes take the NSAID you know if it's if it's helping with that level of functional improvement
Meaning, if it's perhaps something minor and they can get by without the NSAID and it's not going to change significantly their level of function, then maybe not taking it will improve healing.
They can't get out of bed, they can't go to work, but an naperson helps them to do that thing so that they can engage with their family, with their friends, with work. Well, then heck yes, take the NSAID, you know, if it's if it's helping with that level of functional improvement.