The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the one that I'll highlight because the results are now very clear and conclusive is a study that was published back in 2002 which was entitled severe dopaminergic neurotoxicity in primates after a common recreational dose regimen of MDMA or ecstasy this paper was published in the journal science which is one of the three Apex journals for publishing scientific research
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they concluded in fact they verified based on some very detailed analysis that what these monkeys were injected with was not actually MDMA but rather was methamphetamine itself