Andrew Huberman· PhD
Yeah, especially, with MDMA because of the propensity for cardiac issues. Because of the amphetamine properties.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Yeah, especially, with MDMA because of the propensity for cardiac issues. Because of the amphetamine properties.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And it's clear that for the treatment of PTSD, it holds promise. It's not absolutely safe, especially for people with cardiac conditions. If you're going to go down that path, you want and need a skilled guide, and this is where I think the laws are really going to have to pay careful attention to who and what is a skilled guide, OK?