Andrew Huberman· PhD
because these medications were originally I think as you're alluding to were developed as a blood pressure treatment and this was sort of an amazing of Target effect that has turned into a billion dollar industry
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because these medications were originally I think as you're alluding to were developed as a blood pressure treatment and this was sort of an amazing of Target effect that has turned into a billion dollar industry
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Viagra was developed to be a it was a 199 before 1998 but it was developed to be a blood pressure medication to control the blood pressure and they started noticing that everyone was getting or cardiovascular medication and everyone was getting erections in the trial
Viagra was not successful as a systemic for blood pressure other words that trial failed and what I read I don't know if it's true but what I read was the trial failed it was fiser I believe that had developed the drug as they're kind of tail is between their legs and they're saying well that sucks you know we just lost all this money on a drug that doesn't treat blood pressure but what they noticed was a difference in the samples being returned