Andrew Huberman· PhD
I agree people should be very cautious and work with an MD who knows what they are doing (or not use peptides at all).
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I agree people should be very cautious and work with an MD who knows what they are doing (or not use peptides at all).
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the first is by prescription from a board-certified medical doctor so some peptides have been approved for one use but they can be prescribed also for off Lael use and here we're talking about FDA approved clinically tested peptides