Paul Saladino· MD
if you treated 100 people with vioxx more people would be harmed and have the adverse offense Adverse Events like those then people would have Improvement in their GI complications
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you treated 100 people with vioxx more people would be harmed and have the adverse offense Adverse Events like those then people would have Improvement in their GI complications
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one out of 40 people who took vioxx had a serious adverse event and you'd have to treat you said 121 to prevent a bad event so you're you're basically it's a habitat event is included in the one out of 40 number