The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
As I learned from a guest on this podcast who's expert in uh cannabis science, um people who smoke cannabis are pretty good at regulating the dose um based on number and duration of inhales, but people that take edibles are often the ones that end up in psychotic episodes um or anxiety attacks due to overconumption because you can eat something very fast before it hits you. There's like there's this delay.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.