The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In other words, we don't go through this process of stepping through and and getting familiar with a molecule and and I think that could explain why people, you know, you're prescribed an opioid, next thing you know, you need that opioid, right? I mean, good good people have been very willing, it's clear, to do bad things to other people >> in effort to try and avoid the withdrawal symptoms of opioids, right? >> And often the person they're harming the most is themselves.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.