The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are drugs that do the opposite that are used for cancer cachexia they are given to people to get them to eat more and they will activate those receptors sometimes they even give people actual cannabinoids to do this to get them to eat more when they have cachexia which is wasting from cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are drugs we use and when people have cancers that we give them cannabinoids to make them hungry because they get cachexia from cancer so we give them cannabinoids to help with the appetite right