The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But if you give a SCID, or another structured psychiatric interview with a clinician, sitting down with this person for a few hours to delve into their history, like you could very reliably determine that this person has either a psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder, or a strong predisposition. You can screen for that, and that's how you address that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.