The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he uh you know he's really languishing and he's really falling behind you know he's got these issues that issues um uh there are all these like loose correlations that I'll just throw out there I often hear and I'm not saying this is the cause but I'll hear oh yeah you know and even their moms will know sometimes they'll say you know he's he's had some like really serious sexual side effects he was using these uh anti-hair loss meds
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.