The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
anytime we're talking about cannabis because of the 70 plus cannabinoids present that could modify or join uh so work in parallel with the effects of THC we're really talking about polypharmacology it's not a pure sub it's not like giving anandamide or or it's not like you know adjusting levels of indis and anide
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.