The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And I just can't help but think there is no magic solution. People have to want to change and on and on, but the Ibogaine sounds like a special tool, different than the other psychedelics, because of the amount of attention and detail that's required to keep people safe while they do it, you need, you know, heart monitoring and it's a medical treatment in many ways.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if it you know how much of that risk could be mitigated if it were administered in a proper setting which would be a setting with cardiac monitoring for example versus you know someone's house