Andrew Huberman· PhD
what did get resolved however is that the very study in question was retracted
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
what did get resolved however is that the very study in question was retracted
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
instead of giving the monkeys mdma they've given him crystal meth which is way better that paper that paper was recall i mean he he did have to pull that paper didn't he he didn't no no he didn't retract the paper he was never attracted i think you can still find it if you look in science you'll still find it's there it's not struck out i think we'll just find there's a there's a correction sorry guys this wasn't mdma this was actually methamphetamine