The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
mirrors what we know about pharmaceuticals that are synthetic there's so much talk now of the pharmaceutical that's gonna save us from coronavirus and I just heard today that Gilead has developed a new molecule and I thought to myself yeah well what's it gonna do in the rest of my body and anyone here who knows someone that takes a medication take a medication any medication pick a medication any medication it has a side effect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
all the pharmaceuticals that you find in a pharmacy have a package insert with these side effects and we must be aware these molecules have side effects some are good some are bad and what is the net benefit or net negative of these molecules in humans