The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
consider this paper the serum uric acid concentrations in meteors fish eaters vegetarians and vegans this is a cross-sectional analysis from the epic oxford cohort study so this is a cohort study it's epidemiology it's not an interventional study but they found that individuals consuming a vegan diet wait for it had the highest serum concentrations of uric acid compared to meat eaters fish eaters and vegetarians especially in men
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.