The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So here's where we still struggle, right, is, you know, if it were up to me, I'd prefer for a woman's HRT to be provided by her GYN, because we want to be able to work in partnership with the GYN who we would like to see an endometrial ultrasound done every year.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
today we now realize that not all women can tolerate pardon me progesterone so you have to be careful so assuming again a woman still has her uterus the estrogen solves most of the problems but then you have to decide can she tolerate the progesterone and it needs to be if given systemically like 100 to 200 milligrams and for some women that is a life-saving intervention I mean they start sleeping better their hair gets thicker they feel better but for some women it literally drives them crazy