The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
or you can take another angle and you say actually maybe you don't need to reduce animal proteins maybe you need to be consuming more of the less methionine-rich proteins and balance out that ratio and that's at least my take on it it's kind of interesting yeah the methionine to glycine ratio is really really important to consider
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But, that will balance the methionine and glycine.