The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because we know that humans can't run on protein so if they can get lots of lean animals it only does them so good they can get rabid starvation once they exceed you know the urea cycle in the liver to process the nitrogen groups but they need either carbohydrate or protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we know that we can only get so many of our calories from protein as humans or before our biochemistry doesn't work well because of the urea threshold in the liver