Paul Saladino· MD
one gram of protein per pound of bodyweight and they showed equivalent levels of glycogen storage and repletion so at that level one gram of protein per pound of bodyweight it looks like glycogen is full
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
one gram of protein per pound of bodyweight and they showed equivalent levels of glycogen storage and repletion so at that level one gram of protein per pound of bodyweight it looks like glycogen is full
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if we fill our glycogen stores with adequate amounts of protein and we have enough creatine from muscle meat is there really does it look theoretically like we would potentially be any weaker without carbohydrates in our diet and i don't think so
at that level one gram of protein per pound of body weight it looks like glycogen is full
i'm getting five grams of creatine per day by eating essentially one kilogram of meat from mostly meat and some organs per day in my diet i'm already maximizing my creatine stores by getting to that a little more than one gram of protein per pound of body weight threshold