The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
but I also believe that meat and protein is so important for the human organism then once we get past 65 the unhelp user bias and the health user bias are completely wiped off the map and even these researchers are forced to admit that over 65 you better not limit protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
His study looked at the link between protein intake and mortality in all people (sedentary etc). Yet he still found people over 65 had lower mortality with higher protein...the opposite for people under 65.