Paul Saladino· MD
the next point that he makes is that we could overtax our liver due to protein causing gluconeogenesis he's claiming that more than 35 40 percent of total calories his protein could lead to issues
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the next point that he makes is that we could overtax our liver due to protein causing gluconeogenesis he's claiming that more than 35 40 percent of total calories his protein could lead to issues
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I can see that there's a certain point after which an amount of protein is going to eventually lead to lack of Q to Genesis that that's unquestionable