The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And there's a lot of talk about like it has to be a complete protein, which is like kind of old school to be honest. I mean like there's um plenty of human uh societies that do not live on meat that live on plants only and none of the plants in isolation are complete proteins but when you eat them together for example rice and beans you have all of the complete proteins necessary to do all the things that need to happen in the body.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Plant-On only diets can certainly be complete protein sources. The the trick is if you're not taking a protein supplement like um pea protein, hemp protein, things like that, you need to get a variety of plant proteins. So, you need to get your proteins from multiple different places. Um soy is a good source of um a complete source of protein um that would meet that requirement. But, you know, chickpeas,
you can mix up and blend different plant-based uh proteins that together have a very n nice protein balanced amino acid profile so combinations are great