Peter Attia· MD
And so what you're talking about here is going up to two so that you can really have an average at least of 1.6, right? You're getting that average.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And so what you're talking about here is going up to two so that you can really have an average at least of 1.6, right? You're getting that average.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And so if you're sitting there listening to this and you're confused and you're asking, "Oh my god, should I be eating two grams per day?" Yeah, more or less. And that way, if you fall short at 1.6, you can be confident that you're okay.
But I'm going to stand by my recommendation. 2 g per kilogram per day. And my rationale again, I explained it earlier in the podcast, but just to restate it, if you aim for two on the day you fall short, you'll still be at 1.6. If you aim for 1.6, on the day you fall short, you'll be 1.2. And that 1.2 won't be made up for on the next day because the downside is asymmetric compared to the upside.
So, if I'm telling somebody to hit 1.6 and one day they're at 1.2, 2. Another day they're at 1.7. Another day they're at 1.5. Another day they're at 1.9. On average they might hit 1.6. But how many days were they below versus how many days were they above? Let's just say it's an equal split. But we've just established the shape of this curve is like this. So that means every day you're below the downside is much greater than the upside of being above. In other words, all the days you're above are not making up for all the days you're below. So, what I'd really like to do is shift the range so that your low day is 1.6 and your high day is maybe 2.2. And then guess what? You don't have days where you are ever ever amino acid restricted.
I think it's far. I mean, it's it's the reason I always target two to even slightly more is that if I fall short I can beat 1.6.