The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I would say that we don't have evidence for that that it would be more beneficial because the question would be what what is the benefit that we're looking for if the benefit that one is looking for is diversity then certainly because we know carboh hydrates can have fiber phytonutrients if you're going to combine it with berries that could certainly be advantageous but not necessary
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is no compelling evidence that that is true that is that you get more anabolic effect if you eat carbohydrate with your protein than if you eat protein alone