Andrew Huberman· PhD
But again, so what I would say is like some of the more milder forms of time-restricted eating appear to be fine for
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But again, so what I would say is like some of the more milder forms of time-restricted eating appear to be fine for
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Now, if you look at some of the more extreme forms of fasting, like alternate day fasting or like 20/2 or 20/4, there are some studies where you do start to see differences in lean body mass.
what we've seen repeatedly is people who after say 6 months of adop opting a very narrow feeding window say one meal a day we lose weight but disproportionately we'll lose lean tissue