The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
also something called the die ass so the digestible indispensable amino acid score which gives you a sense of how much of any amount of protein you can actually utilize and if you look at those scores animal protein is more than twice as utilizable you know then in the body then plant protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the diocese is the digestible indispensable amino acid score
plant foods are not as bioavailable in terms of protein I've talked about that in detail you can look at the dye a score James Wilkes was dead wrong about this on Joe Rogan end of story
I think his characterization that of that is false and it's pretty darn accurate test and and you can look at the dye ass for animal foods versus plant foods and see that that plant foods are much less bioavailable
there is no comparison in the utilizability of animal source protein versus plant source protein plant source proteins are abysmally utilized by humans