The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
However, PRP, despite what you may have heard, is not stem cells. Somebody tells you they're injecting stem cells, they're either outside the US, Canada, or Northern Europe, or they're injecting something else.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my understanding is that PRP contains very few if any stem cells um and that it's not legal to assert that PRP is stem cell therapy