The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So ketamine can be addictive. It's minimally addictive. It's more like psychologically addictive than it is truly physically addictive, right? I mean, it's I don't really like making those differences because addiction is addiction. Um, but it is it does have more abuse potential as opposed to the classical psychedelics where like you if you keep hitting that serotonin receptor, it just stops working.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and that's probably when we were talking before about the you know the abuse potential maybe why it's got a higher abuse potential because that's right it has less of a negative feedback loop