The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So today, we're going to talk about nearly every feature of psilocybin possible, including what psilocybin is, how it works at the level of chemistry cell biology, and neural networks, and neuroplasticity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
My understanding is that psilocybin is decriminalized in Oakland, but that's not the same as being legal.
Well, there is in Oregon. That's actually what Todd was presenting at, which is Yeah. Um because you It is legal. Um, >> it's legal, not just decriminalized. >> Correct. Yeah. >> Okay. Because in Oakland and California, it's decriminalized. Silicon is decriminalized. >> Yeah. Oak Oakland's very different. Yeah. No, in Oregon, you actually you you are licensed by the state to do this. I see. So, yeah.